Understanding testing challenges and standardizing practices for sample collection and processing can increase tissue availability and improve access to HRR testing¹
Testing Challenges with Archival Tissue Biopsy
- Not always available or sometimes with insufficient tumor content
- Old tumor tissue can lead to poor quality DNA
- May underestimate the heterogeneous character of the tumor / metastases
- Does not allow for monitoring tumor in real time
Recommendations
- Latest available sample should be utilized for biomarker testing
- If only old archival material is available, resection specimens, ideally with high tumor cellularity, are preferred over core biopsies.
- Optimal fixation of tumor tissue is necessary to minimize DNA degradation
- Selection of FFPE block with sufficient tumor content is critical for biomarker testing
- Macrodissection can be used to increase tumour content and DNA yield
Protocols for processing bone metastasis need to be optimized¹
Testing Challenges with Metastatic Tissue Biopsy
- Invasive
- The most common metastatic site for prostate cancer is bone (≥80% of patients with metastatic prostate cancer).. Bone metastases in prostate cancer are most often sclerotic, rather than lytic, making bone biopsies technically challenging as often the sample is inadequate for diagnosis and molecular analysis
- Processes for isolating DNA from bone involves acid washes which can also degrade DNA leading to issues for molecular analysis
Recommendations
- Utilize soft-tissue metastases (e.g. lymph nodes) over bone metastases where feasible
- If new tissue is procured for NGS testing, ideally multiple core biopsies per lesion should be obtained
- It is recommended to avoid harsh acid-based decalcification methods for bone metastases and rather use ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid-based calcium extraction
If the result from liquid biopsy testing is negative, testing should be repeated with tissue sample to exclude false negative result¹'²
Testing Challenges with Liquid Biopsy
- Some tumors barely shed ctDNA, can generate false negative results
- Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) can generate false positive results
- Release of ctDNA varies between disease stages
- Accurate determination of CNVs has been shown to be difficult, especially in low tumor fraction settings. Detection of structural variants like homozygous deletions and large rearrangements can also be challenging.
- Low variant allele frequency (VAF)
- Highly fragmented (+/-170bp)
Recommendations
- If results of ctDNA analysis are negative, test should be repeated with tissue to exclude false negative results. It is critical to include test limitations in the report, for correct interpretation of the results.
- Test standardization for ctDNA testing is needed
- More sensitive methods are necessary to decrease the incidence of false negative results